Tuesday, 8 March 2011

//3// Reflections on Teaching Matrices to Miss C’s year 8 (7/2/11) by Alistair Bissell

‘Matrices’ is a common task in my school’s scheme of work for year 8 (see Previous Post) where students investigate the effects of transforming shapes using different 2x2 matrices.  The starting point is to get students to plot points A to F (shown in blue below), and to transform them with the matrix 

Thinking about how to get a class of mixed ability year 8 students to do this can be very daunting for teachers who have not taught this task before, but our department has found it to be very engaging for students once they get over the initial hurdle of being able to transform shapes. In discussing with another teacher (Miss C) how they might begin this task, I offered to teach the first lesson so that they could observe. I have previously had the opportunity to observe another teacher teach my class, and found it very influential – it is always helpful to observe other teachers, but to see what your own students do with another teacher can be fascinating and surprising! Having offered to do this, I now had the daunting task of planning a lesson for an established class of students that I’d not taught before.

In a first lesson with a new class I generally aim to get students working mathematically as quickly as possible so that I can comment on their mathematical behaviour, as this provides a way of giving students purpose and supporting them in working mathematically. I was aware that a first lesson on matrices would not necessarily be open enough for students to display many of the behaviours I consider to be mathematical; at least not for the majority of the lesson, while they need to learn (be able to reproduce) the process of transforming a shape with a 2x2 matrix. I was aware that these year 8 students were familiar with PLTS (Personal Learning and Thinking Skills) language of Creative Thinker, Self Manager, Team Worker, Independent Enquirer, Reflective Learner and Effective Participator, and would have experiences from year 7 which they would relate to these labels, so referring to these might provide strategies to support them in this lesson.

Most of my time in planning this lesson went into thinking about what the students would need in order to be successful in performing a matrix transformation, as this would provide things for me to focus my comments on in the lesson. I found it very difficult to pin down what was mathematical about transforming a shape using a 2x2 matrix. It definitely involves plotting coordinates, multiplying and adding, but there is more to working mathematically than this! I began to question what it was that I wanted these students to learn in this lesson, and while I definitely valued the learning that had taken place when I’d worked on this task in previous years, it began to feel like the main purpose of this first lesson was to set up a situation that students could go on to investigate in the following lessons. I have never really considered being able to perform a complex process to be particularly mathematical, but this seemed to be the most mathematical aspect of what the students would be doing for the majority of the lesson, and felt like something that I could comment on.

My school currently insists on having three (all, most, some) learning objectives on the board in every lesson, so I have been experimenting with these being aspects of working mathematically that I can focus my comments on. For this lesson I chose:

All:          Self Manager – Be able to carry out a complex mathematical process
Most:      Reflective Learner – Write a comment about what you notice
Some:     Effective Participator – Share your work with other students

I was surprised that the focus of ‘Self Manager – be able to carry out a complex mathematical process’ felt completely natural in the lesson, as I could link nearly everything the students did to this! Suddenly getting stuck became part of being mathematical, as did putting your hand up to ask a question, talking to other students and checking whether answers were correct.

I was able to comment when students were demonstrating behaviours that were helpful, for example when a student put up their hand to ask for help I was able to comment that ‘when mathematicians work on carrying out a complex procedure they might ask someone for help’. Usually when I am commenting on an aspect of working mathematically I am only able to do this when I see helpful behaviours, but with the focus of being able to carry out a complex mathematical procedure I was also able to comment when students were demonstrating behaviours that were unhelpful. For example, when a student called out ‘I don’t get it’ I was able to comment that ‘it’s okay to be stuck because this is part of what we’re working on today, what to do when we’re stuck. What strategies have we got for if we’re carrying out a complex procedure and we get stuck?’

Many of these behaviours came from students’ lack of confidence and not being sure they were doing things correctly, as the process is complicated. Labelling these behaviours as aspects of being able to carry out a complex mathematical process seemed to allow the students to feel like they were making progress even when they were stuck, and provided them with extra resilience and motivation.  I’m not sure about the purpose of the ‘Self Manager’ bit, but I suspect that the objective would not have been as powerful without it, as the students could recognise this as something they had worked on and thought about from ‘Learning Challenge’ lessons in year 7.  My sense was that because ‘being able to carry out a mathematical process’ was an aspect of both being a ‘Self Manager’ and being a ‘Mathematician’, it gave an extra sense of purpose to what the students were doing.  While the focus of being able to carry out a complex mathematical process was supportive for me in commenting on students’ behaviours, I feel that the focus of being a ‘self manager’ was more supportive for the students in finding strategies for carrying out a complex process.

I ended the lesson by displaying the image (shown above) of the shape before and after it had been transformed and asking students what had changed and stayed the same. It felt as though most students were ready and determined to have a go at performing their own transformation next lesson, and in this respect the lesson felt successful. While my sense is that most students had been challenged and had felt like they had become more at ease with working on things that they found hard, I’m still left pondering what mathematics these students learned.

//2// Matrices and Transformations (Notes from a Scheme of Work)

A first lesson:

(The teacher's voice is italicised.)

Draw a co-ordinate grid in your books from 0 to 12 on x and y ...
Draw one on the board as you say this, or have one already drawn.
... and draw this shape at exactly the same points.

What is it? A church, yes!
We are going to do a process involving these numbers that will change the shape.
   
We will do it point by point. But first, so we know what we are talking about we need to label each point. Call this point A, what are its co-ordinates? Okay, in this project we write co-ordinates vertically. We are going to work together until everyone can do this process. Copy this into your books as we do it.
1st row, 1st column, multiply in pairs and add                     
2nd row, 1st column, multiply in pairs and add          
                        A                                                   A’
Repeat these instructions for every point. Invite volunteers to complete.
Label and draw each of the new points:


What has happened to the shape?
You may want to introduce the language of stretches or shears and write up things like ‘What happens to the area?’ if students mention that kind of thing.
Try out your own numbers instead of    
... and see what happens to your own shape.

You may want to discuss sensible shapes to try.
Challenge: In 5 lessons time I will come in and write a set of four numbers (a matrix) on the board and your task will be to tell me what effect it will have just by looking at it.

Where this can go

You may need to share ideas about how to explore this challenge in an organised way. With less confident students the investigation can be limited to matrices of the form
Students may find several types of matrix that transform a 2D shape to a line. These are 'crushing' matrices, and it can be interesting to try and characterise them (e.g., conjecture that all matrices of the form ... will be crushes).

If students work on paper this can be pinned to a board. They must write what the matrix has done to their shape before they pin the paper to the board. Questions may arise from looking at the matrices others have tried. Someone could organise the class results and feedback how they did it. What do other people notice? So, what questions could we ask? Can you generalise or predict? What happens to the areas of your shapes?

At some point focus the class on the basic transformations: reflection, rotation, enlargement, stretch, identity, crush (ie when the shape becomes a line or point), shear. Ask if anyone has a matrix that does one of these things only. Create a space on the board for students to write up matrices that do these basic transformations, see if anyone can generalise, eg an enlargement scale factor n is: 




Someone could organise the class results under these headings.
Some students may even want to extend such generalisations, eg to 3D.

Get students to try and find the inverse matrix eg of an enlargement.


Guidelines for notes at the end of the topic

A reflection has a line of symmetry.
A rotation has a centre of rotation, a number of degrees and a direction (clockwise or anti-clockwise).
An enlargement has a centre of enlargement and a scale factor. If a shape is enlarged by a scale factor of n, each side becomes n times longer and the area becomes n2 times bigger.

[You may want to draw illustrations of these points.]


Vocabulary

Reflection, rotation, enlargement, stretch, shear, crush, identity, inverse.


Further Reading

This activity & lesson start was taken from an original idea by Laurinda Brown, for a fuller write up see:

Brown, L. (1991) Stewing in your own juice. In  D. Pimm and E. Love (eds) Teaching and Learning School Mathematics. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

A similar activity is also written up by Don Cohen, see:

Cohen, D. (1995) Changing shapes with matrices. Champaign, Illinois: Don Cohen – The Mathman. (Also see: http://www.mathman.biz/)